Artur,
When the Mark 3's first came out, they had the rear subframe lower mount just above and behind the swinging arm pivot. Quite a few of these frames suffered from fractures that were put down to the complex stresses set up in the swinging arm pivot lug. To overcome this, Mr Douglas supplied replacement frames that had the lower mount moved to the bottom of the lug (as on your frame). This also required a modification to the subframe to match the main frame. Looking closely at your frame, it has straight sided plates where the nose of the saddle fits - on later frames, these plates were curved. From this, I would assume your frame to be one of those that were replaced under guarantee (and may not have been stamped by the factory). Later, this may have caused problems with local registration authorities when machines needed to be identifiable for the purposes of roadworthiness testing - (in the UK, the MOT) - in which case a new number may have been issued. This number may not have had any relevance to the original and may have been something like a combination of the number of the issuing office and the date of issue - anything was possible!
There are quite a few Mark 3 machines around with the Douglas supplied replacement frames which are often mistaken for later Mark 4 or 5 frames.
Hopefully, this helps a little.
Regards,
Eddie.