>
>"lucy" <losemind@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1134502603.115693.72580@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>I failed to integrate the exponential kernel against the sinc
>> function...
>>
>> Does anybody know what is the Laplace transform of an ideal low pass
>> filter?
>
>If you will admit the Bilateral Laplace Transform (which is also known as

>the Complex Fourier Transform) then the answer is yes.
>
>But the particular function you ask about simplifies so that the

transform

>becomes the ordinary Fourier Transform - for which there is no label

using

>"Laplace" that I know of .... because the Laplace Transform requires the

>functions be causal and the impulse response of the ideal lowpass filter

>isn't causal.

>
>It revolves around the region of "t" being either from -infinity to
>+infinity or from 0 to infinity (causal).
>The pairs are:
>
>Transform: t s
>Complex Fourier and Bilateral Laplace -inf to +inf sigma + jw
>ordinary Fourier -inf to +inf jw
>ordinary Laplace 0 to +inf sigma + jw
>
>Ideal lowpass filter:
> -inf to +inf jw
>
>Therefore......... ordinary Fourier.... or Bilateral Laplace with sigma=0

if

>you will.
>
>Fred
>
>
>

your problem is to find the integral Integral(0->inf) exp(-st)sin(t)/t
dt.
You may use the following property of the Laplace transforms:
L(f(t)/t) = Integral(s -> inf) F(u)du where L{f(t)}= F(s).
regarding that L{sin(t)} = 1/s^2+1, the integral would be sth like
pi/2-arctan(s) (Do it yourself!)

Reply by kpepp●January 13, 20062006-01-13

>
>"lucy" <losemind@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1134502603.115693.72580@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>I failed to integrate the exponential kernel against the sinc
>> function...
>>
>> Does anybody know what is the Laplace transform of an ideal low pass
>> filter?
>
>If you will admit the Bilateral Laplace Transform (which is also known as

>the Complex Fourier Transform) then the answer is yes.
>
>But the particular function you ask about simplifies so that the

transform

>becomes the ordinary Fourier Transform - for which there is no label

using

>"Laplace" that I know of .... because the Laplace Transform requires the

>functions be causal and the impulse response of the ideal lowpass filter

>isn't causal.

>
>It revolves around the region of "t" being either from -infinity to
>+infinity or from 0 to infinity (causal).
>The pairs are:
>
>Transform: t s
>Complex Fourier and Bilateral Laplace -inf to +inf sigma + jw
>ordinary Fourier -inf to +inf jw
>ordinary Laplace 0 to +inf sigma + jw
>
>Ideal lowpass filter:
> -inf to +inf jw
>
>Therefore......... ordinary Fourier.... or Bilateral Laplace with sigma=0

if

>you will.
>
>Fred
>
>
>

your problem is to find the integral Integral(0->inf) exp(-st)sin(t)/t
dt.
You may use the following property of the Laplace transforms:
L(f(t)/t) = Integral(s -> inf) F(u)du where L{f(t)}= F(s).
regarding that L{sin(t)} = 1/s^2+1, the integral would be sth like
pi/2-arctan(s) (Do it yourself!)

Reply by Fred Marshall●December 15, 20052005-12-15

"lucy" <losemind@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1134502603.115693.72580@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>I failed to integrate the exponential kernel against the sinc
> function...
>
> Does anybody know what is the Laplace transform of an ideal low pass
> filter?

If you will admit the Bilateral Laplace Transform (which is also known as
the Complex Fourier Transform) then the answer is yes.
But the particular function you ask about simplifies so that the transform
becomes the ordinary Fourier Transform - for which there is no label using
"Laplace" that I know of .... because the Laplace Transform requires the
functions be causal and the impulse response of the ideal lowpass filter
isn't causal.
It revolves around the region of "t" being either from -infinity to
+infinity or from 0 to infinity (causal).
The pairs are:
Transform: t s
Complex Fourier and Bilateral Laplace -inf to +inf sigma + jw
ordinary Fourier -inf to +inf jw
ordinary Laplace 0 to +inf sigma + jw
Ideal lowpass filter:
-inf to +inf jw
Therefore......... ordinary Fourier.... or Bilateral Laplace with sigma=0 if
you will.
Fred

Reply by Randy Yates●December 15, 20052005-12-15

lucy wrote:

> I failed to integrate the exponential kernel against the sinc
> function...
>
> Does anybody know what is the Laplace transform of an ideal low pass
> filter?

Yes, many people know. People like Oppenheim, Manolakis, Bracewell,
et al. They put that information in these nice little containers called
"books." You should try one some time.
--RY

Reply by Ingeniur●December 14, 20052005-12-14

"lucy" <losemind@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1134502603.115693.72580@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

> I failed to integrate the exponential kernel against the sinc
> function...
>
> Does anybody know what is the Laplace transform of an ideal low pass
> filter?
>
> thanks
>

It would be something like
(1-exp(-sT))/s
Ing

Reply by lucy●December 13, 20052005-12-13

I failed to integrate the exponential kernel against the sinc
function...
Does anybody know what is the Laplace transform of an ideal low pass
filter?
thanks