...this is written on a postcard. 1923 Douglas 746cc
bore 86mm stroke 68mm. Max rev 12500. Electrically timed 1/2 Mile 101 mph.
Specially assembled and tuned.
Brooklands Weybridge.
So was this an S2 engine which has been bored out to 86mm and would it rev to 12,500?
"1923 Douglas 746cc". It could be, externally there is not much to see between a 348 (60.5x60, I think), 494 (68x68), or (83x68) 733 cc "Sports" Douglas. Pullin (and others) were racing the complete set of bikes during 1922. As noted above, the engine (at least) in Nesbit's bike is very special by having twin carburettors and an air box: think of this as a "works" Douglas engine.
"bore 86mm stroke 68mm". This would give 790cc. An S2 was usually listed as 83x68, which would give 736cc, even though the engine was always quoted as 733cc.
"Max rev 12500". No, about half that. According to 1923 Douglas racing advice, "Originally this engine [the 494 S1] was designed to run continuously at about 3,000 to 4,000 r.p.m. Since then the revolutions have been sent up, until to-day it "revs" for considerable periods at 6,000 r.p.m." The race engines that ran at 6,000 rpm used the RA-style central-boss piston, triple valve springs, etc.
"Electrically timed 1/2 Mile 101 mph". This almost certainly refers to Cyril Pullin's famous record on 23 March 1922 at Brooklands on the 494. Huge controversy at the time because no-one ever (more or less!) timed the 1/2 mile. Pullin took his twin-carb S2 to Paris late in 1922 and broke 1 km records at 98+ mph, average of both directions. So Pullin's S2 would have been capable of 100mph over a timed 1/2 mile, but I don't think he, or anyone else, did this. On the same day his 350 Sports averaged nearly 92 mph for the 1 km.
[Edit: Pullin's official speed was 100.06 mph, rather than "101".]
"Specially assembled and tuned. Brooklands Weybridge." Yes indeed: I'd guess that all twin-carb Douglas racing engines came out of Pullin's Brooklands workshop in this era.
"So was this an S2 engine which has been bored out to 86mm and would it rev to 12,500?" Since the 12,500rpm is in error, I'm not sure we should pay too much attention to the "86mm bore": it might be correct, or it might not. But it certainly suggests that Nesbit's Douglas was a "750" rather than a "500".
Stuff written on the back of photos is fascinating, but often a little off the mark. I wonder if Nesbit wrote on the back of the photo 20-or-more years on, with imperfect memory. The engine in his bike is special, and I think the notes on the back of the photo tend to confirm this, even if they mix in a bit of Pullin's 500cc record. A 750 twin carb "works" engine?
Worth noting that "ER 427" on Nesbit's ohv Douglas is a Cambridge rego, which fits in with Nesbit's father Herbert being the Douglas agent in Cambridge.
Keep going Roy!
Leon